Lennon Legend: The Very Best Of John Lennon


Amazon.co.uk
Imagine a place where the personal, political, and emotional elements of John Lennon’s music converge together seamlessly in one cohesive production. An assortment of his finest solo work, Lennon Legend: The Very Best of John Lennon is of great interest to anyone who’s ever been a fan of the Beatles, the Plastic Ono Band, Yoko Ono, or simply the genius himself. Ranging from a rendition of Ben E. King’s “Stand By Me” to the sounds of the Plastic Ono Band and the Harlem Comm… More >>

Lennon Legend: The Very Best Of John Lennon

Bookmark and Share
  1. #1 by Anonymous on July 27, 2010 - 12:27 am

    This compilation might have been more aptly titled “The Very Worst of John Lennon.” I have always been a Beatles’ fan, but I never understood those Beatlemaniacs who made demigods of four average musicians who wrote some nice little melodies and who were packaged and promoted by a crafty public realtions man. If it were not for Brian Epstein, the Beatles quite probably would have gotten no farther than playing in dumpy clubs in Liverpool and Hamburg. More precisely, I never got the big fuss over John Lennon. Sure, it’s a shame the way he was murdered. But as both a person and a mucisian, Lennon was far from some moralistic, enlightened wunderkind. He wasn’t even a nice guy by the accounts of his closest “friends.” More to the point, Lennon’s musical output in his post-Beatles’ years was comprised of monotonous tunes (i.e., “Mind Games”), and druggie-influenced vamps like “Instant Karma.” His supposed “masterpiece”——”Imagine”—- is musically dronish and is lyrically little more than self-therapy for a guy who was paranoid and chemically dependent. None of these songs required a Cole Porter or Irving Berlin to write them. They are juvenile and simplistic to the point of being inane and meaningless. Indeed, Lennon’s early Beatles compositions were primarily your typical three chord, twelve bar rock and roll. When he did attempt anything more sophisticated, he almost always came up short. While McCartney wrote dozens of melodious ballads, Lennon wrote mostly loud, abrasive songs littered with an overuse of pronouns and an abundance of grammatically silly word usage. The themes underlying virtually every one of his songs is jealousy, insecurity, and being dumped (remember “I’m A Loser?” “Help,” and “Misery”). He sang off key—screamed really—and he played only a small number of chords, as by his own admission he was not even a fair guitar player. He also was limited to piano playing only in the key of “C,” which is the easiest key in which to play. There were exceptions, like “Norwegian Wood,” but his overall sense of melody and harmony is juvenile compared with that of McCartney (who also had a far more pleasant and wider-ranging singing voice, and who also played a half-dozen instruments very well). And believe me, I harbor no delusions that McCartney was a musical genius. He was simply a far better mucisian and composer than Lennon. Indeed, by the 1970s Lennon’s cruelty toward the handicapped, the obese, and the less fortunate became psychotic. I also don’t remember this allegedly great liberal humanitarian divesting himself of his fortune to help the needy. With his maids, chauffers, numerous $100,000 automobiles, and multimillion dollars’ worth of property around the world, the only appropriate word for describing Lennon is “hypocrite” with a capital “H.”
    Rating: 1 / 5

  2. #2 by Anonymous on July 27, 2010 - 2:48 am

    “Talk is cheap!!!” Whoever said this was 100% correct. Take, for example, John Lennon’s famous line “imagine no possessions….” This, coupled with his lavish life-style, accurately sums-up Mr. Lennon’s legacy as the epitomy of 1960’s excess and contradiction…the legacy of a man with a lot of advice, but, sadly, very little action.
    Consider this: in an age of first and third world poverty and inequity, a condition which he raged against, John Lennon managed to spend more money on opulence and “chemical gratification” than many of us make in a lifetime. This is documented. Yet, he was cognizant for long enough to preach his shallow musings to the rest of us…”do as I say, but not as I do.” Go figure!
    A sad legacy indeed, this album aptly depicts, through sound and word, what was wrong with the both Lennon and the utopian dream of the 60’s and 70’s: a lot of big ideas with no tangible actions to back them up. As a 1960’s progressive icon, John Lennon did more by example to damage his cause than he probably ever realized, and one cannot honestly listen to his music without this context in mind. After all, it’s one thing to “imagine no possessions”; it’s another thing give teeth to an otherside hollow and shallow fantasy. Listener beware!!!
    Rating: 1 / 5

  3. #3 by Anonymous on July 27, 2010 - 5:34 am

    Another cynical attempt by Yoko Ono, the millionaire, to take your money by recycling yet again Lennon’s work. I guess the baby-boomers can afford it, right? Let’s face it, John Lennon’s post-Beatle solo career was an utter failiure. His five year break in the late seventies was a career move, nothing more and nothing less.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  4. #4 by so very bored on July 27, 2010 - 6:13 am

    I have gotten this cd becasue there was a time when i listen to the beatles all the time. At the time i listen to classic beatles cds like rubber and such but i rarely listen to this cd. Actually i liked George Harrison’s last cd better. There are good songs on this like imagine but that has been played to death. I like the song mother becasue it is very personal. I also like jealous guy but Roxy music did a better version of it anyway. Why do people keep critizing paul for doing senitimental sap John has done his fair share of it and alot of it is on this cd. Songs like dream 9, beautiful boy, just like starting over are sappy. Even Someone as bad as celine dion covered beautiful boy. Another thing about john was he did not have much of a voice it was not bad but it also was nothing to write home about.
    Rating: 2 / 5

  5. #5 by M. D. Fonseca on July 27, 2010 - 8:11 am

    Just another compilation trying to cash in over the great John Lennon.Sad.
    Rating: 1 / 5